mex software (mfl software)  (Advantech)

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Empirical estimation of marine phytoplankton assemblages in coastal and offshore areas using an in situ multi-wavelength excitation fluorometer

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257258

Figure Lengend Snippet: MEX, TChla MEX TChla are abbreviations of in situ multi-wavelength excitation fluorometer, total chlorophyll a concentration estimated with MEX and , total chlorophyll a concentration estimated with the pigment analyses. Comparisons were performed in nine chemotaxonomic phytoplankton groups (chlorophytes, cryptophytes, cyanophytes, diatoms, dinoflagellates, haptophyte type 3 haptophyte type 4, prasinophytes, and prochlorophytes). The MEX-based proportion was estimated based on the database ( U 1), which only removed the target data from U . The thin dased and the bold lines denote the 1:1 line and the linear regression line, respectively. The gray lines indicated 95% confident intervals of the differences between MEX-based and pigment-based proportions.

Article Snippet: Wang et al. [ ] indicated that the default conversion method from the fluorescence to the phytoplankton assemblages using the MEX software (MFL software, JFE-Advantech, Hyogo, Japan) is limited in the field studies and that site-specific methods are required for better estimations.

Techniques: In Situ, Concentration Assay

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Empirical estimation of marine phytoplankton assemblages in coastal and offshore areas using an in situ multi-wavelength excitation fluorometer

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257258

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparisons in nine chemotaxonomy phytoplankton groups (chlorophytes, cryptophytes, cyanophytes, diatoms, dinoflagellates, haptophyte types 3 and 4, prasinophytes, and prochlorophytes). The concentration was computed by multiplying proportions of phytoplankton by TChla or TChla MEX . The thin dashed line denotes the 1:1 line, and the bold line with shadow denotes the linear regression line.

Article Snippet: Wang et al. [ ] indicated that the default conversion method from the fluorescence to the phytoplankton assemblages using the MEX software (MFL software, JFE-Advantech, Hyogo, Japan) is limited in the field studies and that site-specific methods are required for better estimations.

Techniques: Concentration Assay

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Empirical estimation of marine phytoplankton assemblages in coastal and offshore areas using an in situ multi-wavelength excitation fluorometer

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257258

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparisons were performed in nine chemotaxonomic phytoplankton groups (chlorophytes, cryptophytes, cyanophytes, diatoms, dinoflagellates, haptophyte type 3, haptophyte type 4, prasinophytes, and prochlorophytes). The dashed and the bold lines with shadow denote the 1:1 line and the linear regression line with standard errors regression analysis, respectively. The gray lines indicated 95% confident intervals of the differences between MEX-based and plant pigment-based proportions.

Article Snippet: Wang et al. [ ] indicated that the default conversion method from the fluorescence to the phytoplankton assemblages using the MEX software (MFL software, JFE-Advantech, Hyogo, Japan) is limited in the field studies and that site-specific methods are required for better estimations.

Techniques: